Soros-Yunus Dhaka Meet: ‘Agent’ Of Regime Change At Delhi’s Door?

It may be recalled that in the immediate aftermath of the coup in Dhaka, an Indian ecosystem took it upon itself to remind the Modi government of the perils of ignoring 'a central fact of modern politics

Jan 30, 2025 - 00:00
 0
Soros-Yunus Dhaka Meet: ‘Agent’ Of Regime Change At Delhi’s Door?

Soros-Yunus Dhaka Meet: ‘Agent’ Of Regime Change At Delhi’s Door?

It may be recalled that in the immediate aftermath of the coup in Dhaka, an Indian ecosystem took it upon itself to remind the Modi government of the perils of ignoring 'a central fact of modern politics authoritarian repression can work only up to a point'. And that for allegedly delegitimising dissent, Narendra Modi would meet the same fate as Sheikh Hasina.

As portents go, this one image would have to be counted among the most ominous for India. Captured on camera, in the majestic Dhaka State Guest House, are members of a delegation from the Open Society Foundation, led by its chair, AlexThe latest instance of Soros’s brazen hobnobbing (that too in the capacity of a de-facto state guest) with Yunus will only deepen suspicions that the collapse of Sheikh Hasina’s government was no spontaneous “people’s revolution’’ against “authoritarianism". In the meeting, virtually injecting himself as a stakeholder, Soros junior said that he would help the “transition" wrought by the “student-led mass uprising that had created significant opportunities to chart a new path for the cocountry

It may be recalled that in the immediate aftermath of the coup in Dhaka, an Indian ecosystem took it upon itself to remind the Modi government of the perils of ignoring “a central fact of modern politics". That “authoritarian repression can work only up to a point". And that for allegedly delegitimising dissent, Narendra Modi would meet the same fate as Sheikh Hasina.

However, the emergence of an overt George Soros link to the incumbent Dhaka regime threatens to alter the attempt at legitimising the coup. Soros, after all, is the self-proclaimed “amoral’’ agent of chaos. He admits that he does not “accept the rules… And in periods of regime change, the normal rules don’t apply."